image text translation
AI’s decision to hand over money?. Gyeongjal, who reviewed the law with GPT, is false.
quote revealed
Administrative Safety Committee
image text translation
‘Sea Ban
Gyeong U-jeong and other government audits
LV C
It is acknowledged that the Hwahaeng Jangwol hat war is jointed with a dozen points, but the emotional impact of the child in social circles is
It is difficult to say that it is nothing more than a curse.
significant in development
Review of relevant legal principles
Tell 20-Yes}Pyo lpilgyeol- %_ Lateral tendon failure – Mental acuity and mental acuity of children who are completely incompetent
It was ruled that “
Difficult, repetitive-continuous taste, specific damage, Commissioner Yeon Jeong-do
Also, the defendant’s actions were somewhat inappropriate or
Yangdong’s central figure? It’s a party. Even if it is said that Byeongpyeonhoe is not a cause for trouble, objectively.
It does not constitute emotional abuse.
In this case, according to the Child Welfare Act,
There is a bar: (Seoul Northern District Court 2019 Testicular 285
la conclusion
judgment)
There is no possibility of victory as there is no criminal suspicion recognized.
Part of the decision not to forward the case by the Yongin Eastern Police Station in Gyeonggi Province, released at the National Assembly’s Public Administration and Security Committee inspection site. Police use the first GPT framework
It contains a quotation of a phrase that does not exist. /National Assembly Broadcasting
Police interactive artificial intelligence chat
GPT
It was later revealed that in the process of writing the decision to not forward the case using , legal principles that did not actually exist were cited. The problem arose when the complainant compared the wording of the decision with the ruling and pointed out errors.
At the National Assembly Public Administration and Security Committee audit held at the Seodaemun-gu Police Agency in Seoul on the 17th, Rep. Kwon Chil-seung of the Democratic Party of Korea disclosed part of the decision not to forward a case violating the Child Welfare Act written by the Yongin Eastern Police Station in Gyeonggi Province.
In the decision, the phrase, “It is difficult to conclude that temporary or fragmentary words and actions alone cause harm to the child’s mental health and development, and repetition, persistence, and specific circumstances of damage must be acknowledged,” was quoted from the Supreme Court and Seoul Northern District Court rulings. However, when Rep. Kwon checked the decision, it was found that the sentence in question did not exist anywhere in the Supreme Court decision.
Acting Police Commissioner Yoo Jae-seong said,
A.I.
He acknowledged the error, saying, “I received a report that it was written using , and it is true that the quotation from the judgment was incorrect.”
“We distributed guidelines related to its use,” he said. Rep. Kwon pointed out, “The police closed the case by citing non-existent legal principles,” and “It was revealed belatedly when the complainant’s legal representative raised an issue during the review process.”
https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/023/0003935124
I’m posting this as a humorous post because it’s ridiculous.