Filter by Category




Surprisingly, this product made it to the Constitutional Court

0
(0)

image text translation

800
Day 1
‘19517173

It is none other than Dawn 808

I wonder why they even had to go to a constitutional trial?

image text translation

“The unconditional ban on expressions that promote drinking is unconstitutional.”
Enter 2000.03.3100.00
It is prohibited to use expressions that promote drinking, such as ‘before and after drinking’ and ‘hangover relief’, in food advertisements.
The decision of the current court is that it is a mistake. Currently, the full court (presiding judge Ko Jung-seok and Geumpyo Soduk) is looking at the decision.
In particular, developer Hang Mo of the 30-day hangover remover ‘Ryomyeong 808’ has been subject to the Food and Drug Administration’s ‘Food Labeling, etc.
This decision was made in a constitutional appeal case in 2011 regarding the ‘standard’.

‘Dawn 808’ has no hangover relief effect

‘Dawn 808’ has no hangover relief effect

image text translation

Constitutional Court 2000. 3. 30. Sentence 99 Hyeonma 143 Full Bench [Article 7 of the Labeling Standards for Food, etc. [Separate]
J1] Detailed labeling standards for food, etc. 1.a 1i)k) False status confirmation] [Collection 12-1, 404]
gaga
[
AI Summary
Decision
“Before and after drinking” on food or food containers and packaging
or “Hangover relief” label or label for food products that are prohibited.
(Enacted by Food and Drug Administration Notice No. 1998-96 on October 7, 1998) Article 7 [Appendix 1] Detailed labeling standards for food, etc.
1. A. 10) K) “Before and after drinking” and “Hangover relief”
The ban on display websites violates basic rights such as freedom of business.
Whether to argue or not (actively)

In 1998, it was illegal to use the phrases “before and after drinking” or “hangover relief” on food.

Banned for “promoting drinking”

So Dawn 808 attacked this as unconstitutional and even went to the Constitutional Court.

The ban on the phrases “before and after drinking” and “because of a hangover” was ruled unconstitutional.

It is said to be a historic event in which a company took on the government and won.

image text translation

Is ‘Dawn 808’ not effective in relieving hangovers? ceremony
Yakcheo’s first disappearance
input
2025-06-19 16.57.00
D
808
DAWN
‘@11
outside
eyn Judy Jooja
The Ministry of Food and Drug Safety is telling me to submit empirical data on hangover relief drinks.
Request to supplement data on Yeomyeong 808, saying she is single
Other products have passed
If you do not pass by supplementing the data by the end of October,
You can’t advertise it as a hangover cure.
DAW
808

‘Dawn 808’ has no hangover relief effect

However, this year, the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety told us to submit proper test results.

Dawn 808 was judged to be insufficient data and had to be prepared and submitted again.

If you don’t pass by the end of October this year, you won’t be able to use the hangover relief phrase.

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Leave a Comment