image text translation
)
Phenomenological logic
1. Mismatch between the new concept of Creator and the phenomenon
In traditional theory
Battery, omnipotence, front
It is assumed to be a creator.
Then the world created by God
The best world
It would be reasonable.
But reality is full of pain, misery, injustice, natural disasters, and innocent death.
This is a head -to -head conflict with ** “made by omnipotent and good creators.”
2.
Problem of Evil
If the almighty and front god creates the world, there should be no evil.
Since there is evil, the new concept is contradictory → thus there may be no creator.
Unemployed suffering
In the process of evolution, the pain, natural disasters, and diseases of animals for hundreds of millions of years are hard to see for any purpose.
This is rather than a designer
Random
Explain better.
ImperFect Design
Human spine, cecum, and vision structure are inefficient and vulnerable.
It is hard to see the result of a perfect intellectual designer.
Evolution can explain this imperfection as a by -product of the natural selection process.
Biblical logic that denies God’s existence
1. Controversy with the evidence of the “goodness of God” traditionally presented
In fact, we have attempted this evidence in the only god of Christianity, Islam, and Judaism.
But strictly, it is more like “religious interpretation” rather than “logical proof”.
Creation
The universe and life are sophisticated and beautiful → There is a good creator behind it.
Controversy: The pain and destruction coexist as much as beauty, so it is not a single evidence of goodness.
Morality
The fact that there is universal conscience and morality in human beings → Traces of good source (god).
Controversy: Evolutionary and social explanation can be explained enough.
Salvation experience
Prayer answers, miracles, and dying experience presented as evidence of “goodness of God”.
Controversy: It is a subjective experience and can be interpreted as “coincidence” or “natural explanation.”
2. The theological defense logic
These are the logic designed to rationalize the “good god”.
Free will
: Evil is the inevitable result of human freedom, a bigger line to give freedom.
→ But natural disasters and children’s pain still cannot be explained.
Soul
: Pain is a tool that mature humans.
→ But if you die without even a chance to mature.
God’s mystery
: Humans are unknown, but ultimately have good purposes.
→ In fact, it is not a logical explanation, but a mystic avoidance.
image text translation
Another
Day.
Alien position (I can ignore it because it’s a bullshit)
In terms of social phenomena, God cannot be good if God does not exist or exists.
If you maintain the premise of “God,” → numerous contradictions and explanations are inevitable, and eventually escape from mystic or magic of “unknown plan.”
If you choose the premise of “no god,” the contradiction is resolved neatly, and only natural explanations remain.
so
Philosophically
Is,
Atheistic hypothesis is not possible/more logically and consistent than the theory
Conclusion: If the picture above is a picture of good and evil, the left devil is trust.