Filter by Category




The main logic put forth by those who abolish fox hunting with hunting dogs

0
(0)

image text translation

Dozens of top hunters on horseback use hounds to search for fox reef.
At this time, we communicate using a trumpet that can make two sounds.
If they find a fox, they kill it by having the hunting dogs bite them in groups.

Bill banning fox hunting using hunting dogs

Passed in the House of Representatives in 2003 with 339 votes in favor and 155 against.

There is strong opposition to abolition from the British royal family, nobility, peasant groups, and religious circles.

Worst of all, without the approval of the Senate, where the majority of nobles are in the House of Representatives,

They even mobilized private laws to pass bills.

(Of course, hunting with firearms is legal)

image text translation

Yonhap News
subscribe
Prince Charles bans fox hunting
Leaving the UK>
Entered 2002.09.24 9.79 am

(

Charles, a leading figure in opposition to the abolition of fox hunting with hunting dogs)

British royal family and aristocrats: Oppose abolition because it is an old tradition

Abolitionists: Even if it is tradition, wrongs must be corrected.

Religious circles: Oppose abolition to protect farmers’ property such as livestock

Abolitionists: Property protected from cruel deaths of foxes.

Farmers’ group: Opposes fox hunting itself

Abolitionist: I am not opposed to effective capture with a gun.

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Leave a Comment