0+2.51 0
image text translation
oiling
1009
post
Lee So-young TV
4 hours ago
As a result of today’s sentence, I am a lawyer before I am a politician.
It’s hard to understand. Even if I am not a member of the Democratic Party
They will judge it the same way.
Regarding the judgment of guilt or innocence, the judgment must be carefully reviewed and evaluated.
However, the sentencing judgment itself of ‘suspended prison sentence’ is
This is completely outside of conventional wisdom and common sense.
I thought there was a high possibility of being objectively innocent, but even so,
Even if found guilty, the penalty cannot exceed a fine of 900,000 won.
Since this is an incident, I cannot make any predictions with any certainty.
There are three reasons for the prediction.
1. Strictly punish ‘unsuccessful candidates’ in public official election law cases
I know. The fact that he was defeated does not mean that his actions will affect the outcome of the election.
don’t go crazy
L
Because it means.
Moreover, President-elect Woon Seok-yeol said, “A 10-won piece for my mother-in-law.”
“I have never harmed you,” and many others who were later confirmed to be fake, including the frame.
Even though there is no argument, the president has the privilege of non-prosecution.
In cases where there is no prosecution; To Representative Lee Jae-myeong, who was defeated,
It is difficult to imagine being sentenced to be deprived of the right to vote.
It’s work.
2 If it is ‘for the purpose of being elected’ rather than ‘for the purpose of losing the election’, take it seriously.
There is no punishment. Article 250 of the Public Official Election Act stipulates that ‘opponents
‘The purpose of being elected to slander’ and ‘the purpose of being elected to make one’s own profit’
The statutory sentences are different depending on the classification. ‘Purpose of winning’
There is no lower limit to the fine, but if it is for the ‘purpose of failing to be elected’, a fine may be imposed.
The lower limit is 5 million won, so if you are found guilty, you will be sentenced to no punishment.
I receive it.
This case has not been prosecuted for the purpose of getting elected, and so far
Sentenced to prison for ‘spreading false information for the purpose of winning election’
I’ve never seen it before.
3. It was not printed and disseminated in public information materials, but rather interviews and
This is just a passive response to questions from the government audit.
There is a big difference between what is done in writing and what is said orally. suddenly
When receiving a question and providing an immediate response within a limited response time
It is difficult for anyone to accurately state the facts. In this case
There is even a Supreme Court ruling that does not constitute a crime.
Sentence?
Even People’s Power legal council members were fined less than 7 million won.
It is said that it was predicted, but for some reason the court did not follow common sense and
I don’t understand why they handed down a sentence that destroys common sense.
It doesn’t.
Since it is still a first trial ruling and it is an unusual judgment,
There is a good chance that it will be corrected at a higher level.
I think. Let us uphold the second trial ruling resolutely and proudly.
4
654
!