Kim Myung-min’s line
>
>
The late prosecutor Seo Byung-joo hated it the most. It’s not a courtesy to the wrongful victims of missing 99 criminals. The duty of the prosecutor is not to make a single person feel wronged. The deceased made an unfair victim through a hit-and-run, and his life as a prosecutor began to collapse, eventually leading to his death. Apparently the deceased didn’t want to add one victim to his death. From the beginning, the investigative agency named me the criminal and investigated me. I ignored the evidence and circumstances that were favorable to me only by looking at the evidence or circumstances that were unfavorable to me. The possibility of premeditated murder, not accidental murder, has been ruled out. It’s been a problem since the investigation buried in the footprints. Would a premeditated murder have done anything foolish to leave a mark? Oh, this is because I don’t want to leave my mark as a defendant. I never thought I’d be on the defendant’s table. I thought I’d be here for the rest of my life until law school.
The prosecutor who made me a defendant is worse than Seo Byung-joo, but he is not as stupid as killing with his fingerprints in anger. Did you say that I can only take a bag of sugar if the real culprit sees me fed it with sugar in my coffee? Witnessing is possible in any other way. The victim’s ballpoint pen investigation agency, whose whereabouts were unknown on the day of the incident, did not even pay attention. The methamphetamine method also ruled out the possibility of injection. If you stabbed him deeply with a methamphetamine needle where the stomach was located, the drug would have gone into the stomach. But why did investigators just pass it off as an insulin injection trail? The defensive wounds were neither desperate nor numerous. If you’re a real criminal who installed a hidden camera without leaving a detailed trace, you’re likely to choose a shot that can kill you quickly. Beverage medications may vary from person to person until death, but they can take up to 30 minutes, and injection medications can take up to 10 minutes even if they collapse within seconds or are injected into a non-venous area. After Kang Sol B and I visited, if the real culprit went to the victim and injected him with methamphetamine around 14:25 p.m., it would almost coincide with the estimated time of death. Footprints, hidden cameras, injections, all these doubts should have come from the prosecution’s side, and all these possibilities should not be ruled out recklessly. You shouldn’t just see what you want to see and hear what you want to hear. I must not commit the foolishness of letting the real criminal walk around in the affirmative bias that I am the criminal. Am I really a law school killer? Don’t you have a reasonable doubt? If you doubt it, please remember it in the interests of the defendant.
This is a smoking gun that proves my alibi. It contains a statement recorded by a friend who came to hack my laptop at that time and hid in the closet to reveal my innocence. I’ve been trying to persuade her to give me as a witness, but I failed, and I’ve encouraged her to give this to Jeon Ye-seul today.
You don’t have to. I don’t want to submit it. Fortunately, we’ve secured a smoking gun, but it doesn’t have the ability to prove it. Regardless of this, I wonder how my ruling will be. Through several trials, I did my best to impeach the evidence of guilt presented by the prosecution, which set the criminal and conducted a fit-and-fit investigation.
The constitutionalist who stated that there was sugar at the scene of the incident came here with a petition that the court did not want to doubt the credibility of his statement. The disciple, who lost his father due to the prosecutor’s announcement of the facts of the crime, sits there, unable to give up hope of presumption of innocence even after tasting the hot taste of the presumption of guilt. The disciple who went to find the real culprit who killed his uncle because he couldn’t see the prosecutor’s shoveling is also paying attention to the ruling. The prosecution has failed to provide a reasonable proof of doubt and it should result in my innocence. As a professor of criminal law, I didn’t teach students that the law was just. It was taught that what makes the law just was the fair weighing of judges based on the presumption of innocence and the justice of evidence. I hope that this court will clearly show those prospective lawyers what a just judgment is by fair weighing. That’s it.
I’ll file it with the appellate court if I’m found guilty.