(1)[Exclusive] “9 CCTVs, not at the entrance
image text translation
(2)”All”… PPT rebuttal to Kang Hyung-wook’s explanation
(3)JoongAng Ilbo | 2024.05.26 17:23Last modified 2024.05.26 18:13
(4)And we plan to take legal action if necessary to protect them.
image text translation
(1)① CCTV: Confirmation of dog theft vs. surveillance, actually at the entrance
image text translation
(2)CEO Kang said, “(Outside) people came, there were goods, and dogs came, so CCTV was absolutely necessary. Dogs could bite us, and there could be theft or intrusion by outsiders, so we installed dozens of CCTVs. CCTV is not for monitoring employees.” In response to the explanation, the employees countered, saying, “From 2014 to 2015, there was one in a villa in Jamwon-dong, Seocho-gu, Seoul, where only office workers were located, and there were nine in an office on the 7th floor of a building in Jamwon-dong from 2015 to 2017.”
(3)Employee B said, “Even though it was a regular office with trainers on the first basement floor in Jamwon-dong and marketing work in the villa next door, so dogs did not come, there were CCTVs.” He added, “After moving to the 7th floor of the Jamwon-dong building, we installed 9 CCTVs in the office. “It was sweet,” he said.
(4)Mr. A claimed, “If the purpose was to prevent theft and identify outsiders, CCTV should have been installed at the entrance, but CCTV was installed in the 7th floor office for surveillance, and there was a fake one installed in the entrance where parcels for delivery were piled up.” At the same time, he asked, “During his trip to Japan, CEO Kang sent a repair technician to say that one of the nine CCTV channels was not working, but what did it mean if it was not surveillance?” After moving into a separate building in Deokso, Namyangju, a CCTV was installed in the entrance. Regarding this, “At the time, there was a blind spot on the entrance CCTV.
(1)② Abuse: “That’s not what I’m saying” vs. “I heard it directly through the wall.” Representative Kang responded to the suspicion that he used abusive language to trainers, such as “Crawl out, you’re not worth breathing,” saying, “It’s not something I’m angry about, and I don’t swear well either.” He added, “You can be as angry as you want without swearing.”
image text translation
(2)In response to this, the employees refuted that they heard CEO Kang verbally abusing the trainer loudly for over 20 minutes from the next room, and that they also had a recording of it. Employee A said, “In a meeting where employees were being questioned about mistakes made outside of work, Director Susan asked, ‘Every day is going to be like hell, what are your plans for the future?’” He added, “Among the employees, there are people who have been gaslighted by saying they are worthy of being verbally abused. “There were a lot of them,” he said.
(3)Employee B complained, “I personally heard CEO Kang call the trainer into the room and yell at him for over 20 minutes, saying, ‘Crawl out, you’re not even worth breathing.’” He added, “Years have passed, but I’m still experiencing the trauma from that time.” Employees also have recordings of some of the verbal abuse.
(1)③Messenger surveillance: Because of male hatred and son-desire vs. “Women should have more children”
image text translation
(2)Regarding the reason why Director Susan paid for the in-house messenger Lineworks and monitored conversations between employees, she said, “Because of the use of anti-male words such as Hannam, ridicule of my just-born 6-7 month old son, and sarcasm about my appearance on entertainment programs. “My eyes rolled over,” he said, adding, “I felt remorse, but I couldn’t let go, so I stayed up all night watching six months’ worth of conversations.”
(3)Employees estimated that messenger monitoring began before July 23, 2018. At this time, CEO Kang and his wife received a consent form from employees to collect and use personal information, saying, ‘We confirm that the messenger program is owned by Bodeum Company and agree to the company viewing information sent and received through the company network.’
(1)Employee A said, “It is not the female employees who first used misogynistic words, but CEO Kang often said things like ‘Women should have a lot of children,’ so while talking on messenger, the male employee said things like ‘Hannam,’ and he agreed with this. ·I just accepted it,” he said. “It doesn’t even make sense that my eyes turned away because I cursed at my son. “Even though I hated CEO Kang, I never hated my son,” he said.
image text translation
(2)Then, the CEO told a plump female trainer to get off the website, and a large male employee posed waddling with his armpits and arms spread out. Who is this person who lacks gender sensitivity?” he said. “The explanation broadcast is not an explanation, but rather the problem raised. It was a witch hunt broadcast against employees. “It was my fault for wanting him to apologize now,” she said.
@
First, CCTV;;
At first, wasn’t it a problem to have CCTV installed in the locker room?
So, Kang Hyung-wook explained on the broadcast that it was not a locker room, but a conference room in his previous office. So, if Kang Hyung-wook’s explanation is false, wouldn’t it be correct to prove that that was the locker room?
However, even in Kang Hyeong-wook’s comment on the YouTube video, there is already a general opinion that CCTV needs to be installed in the office, and all that is said to be a rebuttal is the claim that it is only an office baby and is for employee surveillance.
Moreover, the informant is the only one who still claims that this is for personal surveillance based on subjective judgment.
Moreover, the informant said that it was for surveillance until the end, and that it was illegal, so he consulted a lawyer and confirmed that it was not illegal.
If the majority of the people do not follow it, it has no value as a law, but 9 out of 10 people say there is no problem, but if you are the only one who raises an objection, is it okay for the middle class to leave, or to overthrow the temple?
If you want your rebuttal to be convincing, please bring the CCTV installed in the locker room.
@ Messenger monitoring;;
In fact, the moment when messenger surveillance was carried out was done after obtaining consent, and the first step of opening Pandora’s box before receiving consent was using an anti-male term. Anyway, the rebuttal was also made by a man who said this.
And does a woman give birth to a child or a man to a child?
I’m worried about the birth rate, so I’m saying it’s natural to say that women should have a lot of children because they hate women, but it’s really ridiculous.
Whether it’s a man or a woman, you also acknowledged that you are the ones who hate and hate certain genders and fight back.
And it’s a dog business, but it’s a place that deals with the gender sensitivity of that damn bitch? Suddenly, on the homepage, he even said something about gender sensitivity.
And finally, regarding verbal abuse, something is passed down and passed on anyway, and it is common in relationships like this.
It seems like it’s not uncommon for instructors to use informal language during driver’s license training… That said, if Kang Hyeong-wook really made such verbal abuse, he should be criticized.
Nevertheless, such chronic ills are a problem that needs to be purified among themselves, and if Kang Hyung-wook admits something, he can apologize.
9760 won is the same.
According to Kang Hyeong-wook’s explanation, he received incentives based on performance through a business contract system rather than a monthly salary system. However, I received a refund at the time I quit, and when I contacted him to discuss payment of incentives, he was not received. Even when I asked him to contact me, there was no contact, so there was a legal deadline for payment, so I deposited it that day.
Originally, Kang Hyeong-wook said that there was no severance pay, but he gave it anyway after receiving legal advice. When he rebutted, he said that it was not that he did not receive the deposit, but that he did receive it.
And the 300 won treat? That’s how he feels… Then, when he gets a call, he should either answer it or do something. If he doesn’t do anything and feels bad because he’s treated like something, then what can he do?
Anyway, in the 16 parts of Kang Hyung-wook’s explanation YouTube video, the only thing that seems to be a problem for Kang Hyung-wook is his verbal abuse.
At this point, based on my personal judgment, I would like to be neutral and raise my hand in favor of Kang Hyung-wook.
By my standards of judgment, yes.