Chumiae TV

(1)Chumiae TV
(2)Modified 3 hours ago
(3)
(4)1 Even though the chief justice at the peak of the judicial administration actually intervened in the trial, the judge was acquitted on the ground that he was not subject to intervention because he exercised judicial power independently, and the chief justice had no authority to intervene
(5)However, it is a “clear ruling to protect the family” that ignores the reality of a court organization with strict internal power or hierarchy through control through evaluation of personnel rights through judicial administration
(6)2 A totally different judgment was made on the obstruction of business of ordinary people with legal and logical structures such as abuse of authority by public officials
(7)Professor Cho Kuk’s son was found guilty of obstruction of business in the case of a proxy test for George Washington University However, the subject of teaching authority is not a university, but a university professor. Therefore, if the logic applied to the case of Chief Justice Yang Seung-tae, the judiciary, which said that the teaching authority of a university professor was independent and not subject to obstruction, judged him guilty of obstruction of business without even asking the professor’s opinion
(8)The professor reportedly responded at a recent appeal hearing that he could not believe that he had not been disturbed in his academic work evaluating students and that he had been charged for such a thing
(9)3. Prosecutors conduct investigations on fabrication of family support, and the court rules on sophistry of family support, and overuse sophistry by opening up small claims against civilians
(10)4 The National Assembly should revise the criminal law to punish public officials for abusing their authority as well as for abusing their position