In 2014, Br>
A>55 worked as an English teacher at a high school run by a B school corporation since 1995. Shortly after his appointment, the students complained about Mr. A’s English class. The school has repeatedly demanded that A participate in English teacher training since 2008 to improve his/her teaching ability. He also demanded that he take a language test and submit his results to improve his English skills.
but he kept delaying his participation in the training and taking the examination. It wasn’t until July 2011 that A took the test that he got a perfect score of 415 points and 990 points for TOEIC. Six months later, he scored a low score of 326 points and 990 points in the TEPS test. After taking the test, he said, “I’ll work hard while I’m at work. He also filed a petition to the school to be generous so that he can continue his teaching career until March 2013, when the pension benefit period arrives.The
school decided to lift Mr. A in March last year if he gets good grades in the English class demonstration evaluation after he was discharged from his job for three months. However, A received a low score of 36.7 points and 100 points on average in three class demonstrations since March last year. The evaluation committee members said, “If I were a principal, I would not be able to work as a middle school student.” “As an English teacher, grammar is a problem and reading is a problem,” and they said, “The fear of English seems great.”In the end, the school dismissed Mr. A from office in May. A filed for a petition review to cancel his dismissal, and the teacher’s petition review committee canceled the dismissal, saying, “It is hard to say that his/her work performance is extremely poor just because of his/her low scores in language and class demonstration evaluation.” In protest, the school filed an administrative lawsuit against the committee to cancel the decision.Cho Yong-gu, 5th deputy judge of administrative affairs at the Seoul High Court, said on the 7th that the school ruled in favor of the plaintiff, saying, “The school’s dismissal of Mr. A is justified.” The court explained, “A is considered to have been very poor in his work as an English teacher, beyond his somewhat poor teaching ability.” “A’s TOEIC score is more than 250 points lower than the average score of those in the education industry, which is significantly lower than expected by high school English teachers,” he added.There is a separate English for Br. Br. Br.
> TOEIC, but 415 points for English teacher? LOL